lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:06:57 +0300
From:   Amir Goldstein <>
To:     Phillip Potter <>
Cc:     Al Viro <>,
        linux-kernel <>,
        linux-fsdevel <>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 01/10] fs: common implementation of file type

On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 12:56 PM Phillip Potter <> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 12:44:50PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > Well, I did request to change some content (the location and the comment
> > above BUILD_BUG_ON section) which is relevant for several patches.
> > However, so far affected patched did not get any Reviewed-by.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Amir.
> Sorry, I missed that bit at the end, was too keen to click through to the
> note about the alleged ext2 bug :-) I will make sure those changes are made
> as well. By location do you mean the location of the v3, v2, etc. stuff and
> your point about including it in the main [0/10] message rather than the
> patches themselves? Again, thank you for your feedback and for being patient
> with me, I really do appreciate it.

By location I meant place BUILD_BUG_ON() at the beginning of
ext2_set_de_type() and not nested inside inner scope of ext2_readdir().
And find similar appropriate places for other patches.

And one more thing for next posting - LKML is probably a too wide forum for
this filesystems cleanup series.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists