linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM/nVMX: Do not validate that posted_intr_desc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181024111718.GB2221@potion.hotspot.internet-for-guests.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Oct 2018 13:17:19 +0200
From:   Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc:     KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@...zon.de>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM/nVMX: Do not validate that posted_intr_desc_addr is
 page aligned

2018-10-24 04:01-0700, Sean Christopherson:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 11:42:59PM +0200, KarimAllah Ahmed wrote:
> > The spec only requires the posted interrupt descriptor address to be
> > 64-bytes aligned (i.e. bits[0:5] == 0). Using page_address_valid also
> > forces the address to be page aligned.
> > 
> > Only validate that the address does not cross the maximum physical address
> > without enforcing a page alignment.
> > 
> > Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> > Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
> > Cc: x86@...nel.org
> > Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > Fixes: 6de84e581c0 ("nVMX x86: check posted-interrupt descriptor addresss on vmentry of L2")
> > Signed-off-by: KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@...zon.de>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > index 30bf860..47962f2 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > @@ -11668,7 +11668,7 @@ static int nested_vmx_check_apicv_controls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >  	    !nested_exit_intr_ack_set(vcpu) ||
> >  	    (vmcs12->posted_intr_nv & 0xff00) ||
> >  	    (vmcs12->posted_intr_desc_addr & 0x3f) ||
> > -	    (!page_address_valid(vcpu, vmcs12->posted_intr_desc_addr))))
> > +	    (vmcs12->posted_intr_desc_addr >> cpuid_maxphyaddr(vcpu)))
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> 
> Can you update the comment for this code block?  It has a stale blurb
> about "the descriptor address has been already checked in
> nested_get_vmcs12_pages" and it'd be nice to state why bits[5:0] must
> be zero (your changelog is much more helpful than the current comment).
> 
> With that:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>

I have just sent a pull request with the stale comment. :(