[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181024.101028.1211941922121897721.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 10:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: wanghaifine@...il.com
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change judgment len position
From: Wang Hai <wanghaifine@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 23:47:29 +0800
> To determine whether len is less than zero, it should be put before
> the function min_t, because the return value of min_t is not likely
> to be less than zero.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghaifine@...il.com>
> ---
> net/ipv4/tcp.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> index 10c624639..49af9fdc3 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> @@ -3301,11 +3301,11 @@ static int do_tcp_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level,
> struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
> int val, len;
>
> + len = min_t(unsigned int, len, sizeof(int));
> +
> if (get_user(len, optlen))
> return -EFAULT;
You can't be serious?
'len' has no value before the get_user() call.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists