[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181025192701.GK25444@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 12:27:01 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: miles.chen@...iatek.com
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
wsd_upstream@...iatek.com, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_owner: use vmalloc instead of kmalloc
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 02:34:41AM +0800, miles.chen@...iatek.com wrote:
> The kbuf used by page owner is allocated by kmalloc(),
> which means it can use only normal memory and there might
> be a "out of memory" issue when we're out of normal memory.
>
> Use vmalloc() so we can also allocate kbuf from highmem
> on 32bit kernel.
... hang on, there's a bigger problem here.
static const struct file_operations proc_page_owner_operations = {
.read = read_page_owner,
};
read_page_owner(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
...
return print_page_owner(buf, count, pfn, page,
page_owner, handle);
}
static ssize_t
print_page_owner(char __user *buf, size_t count, unsigned long pfn,
struct page *page, struct page_owner *page_owner,
depot_stack_handle_t handle)
{
...
kbuf = kmalloc(count, GFP_KERNEL);
So I can force the kernel to make an arbitrary size allocation, triggering
OOMs and forcing swapping if I can get a file handle to this file.
The only saving grace is that (a) this is a debugfs file and (b) it's
root-only (mode 0400). Nevertheless, I feel some clamping is called
for here. Do we really need to output more than 4kB worth of text here?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists