[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181025071140.GK18839@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 09:11:40 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, guro@...com,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yang.s@...baba-inc.com,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,oom: Use timeout based back off.
On Wed 24-10-18 15:54:54, Andrew Morton wrote:
[...]
> There has been a lot of heat and noise and confusion and handwaving in
> all of this. What we're crying out for is simple testcases which
> everyone can run. Find a problem, write the testcase, distribute that.
> Develop a solution for that testcase then move on to the next one.
Agreed! It is important for these test to represent some reasonable
workloads though.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists