lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181025090205.GB30828@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Oct 2018 12:02:05 +0300
From:   Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] usb: typec: Find the ports by also matching
 against the device node

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:27:20AM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 08:07:09PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > Hello!
> > 
> > On 10/24/2018 06:05 PM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > 
> > > When the connections are defined in firmware, struct
> > > device_connection will have the fwnode member pointing to
> > > the device node (struct fwnode_handle) of the requested
> > > device, and the endpoint will not be used at all in that
> > > case.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/usb/typec/class.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> > >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/class.c b/drivers/usb/typec/class.c
> > > index 5db0593ca0bd..fe6f3a932a88 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/class.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/class.c
> > > @@ -204,15 +204,28 @@ static void typec_altmode_put_partner(struct altmode *altmode)
> > >  	put_device(&adev->dev);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > -static int __typec_port_match(struct device *dev, const void *name)
> > > +static int typec_port_fwnode_match(struct device *dev, const void *fwnode)
> > > +{
> > > +	return dev_name(fwnode) == fwnode;
> > 
> >    dev_name(dev), maybe?

Actually:

        dev_fwnode(dev) == fwnode;


Cheers,

-- 
heikki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ