| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20181025093833.GA23607@rapoport-lnx>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:38:34 +0100
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
arcml <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org,
"moderated list:H8/300 ARCHITECTURE"
<uclinux-h8-devel@...ts.sourceforge.jp>,
linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
nios2-dev@...ts.rocketboards.org,
Openrisc <openrisc@...ts.librecores.org>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
SH-Linux <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:GENERIC INCLUDE/ASM HEADER FILES"
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] arm64: Cut rebuild time when changing
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 02:55:17PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 2:33 PM Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > While investigating why ARM64 required a ton of objects to be rebuilt
> > when toggling CONFIG_DEV_BLK_INITRD, it became clear that this was
> > because we define __early_init_dt_declare_initrd() differently and we do
> > that in arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h which gets included by a fair
> > amount of other header files, and translation units as well.
>
> I scratch my head sometimes as to why some config options rebuild so
> much stuff. One down, ? to go. :)
>
> > Changing the value of CONFIG_DEV_BLK_INITRD is a common thing with build
> > systems that generate two kernels: one with the initramfs and one
> > without. buildroot is one of these build systems, OpenWrt is also
> > another one that does this.
> >
> > This patch series proposes adding an empty initrd.h to satisfy the need
> > for drivers/of/fdt.c to unconditionally include that file, and moves the
> > custom __early_init_dt_declare_initrd() definition away from
> > asm/memory.h
> >
> > This cuts the number of objects rebuilds from 1920 down to 26, so a
> > factor 73 approximately.
> >
> > Apologies for the long CC list, please let me know how you would go
> > about merging that and if another approach would be preferable, e.g:
> > introducing a CONFIG_ARCH_INITRD_BELOW_START_OK Kconfig option or
> > something like that.
>
> There may be a better way as of 4.20 because bootmem is now gone and
> only memblock is used. This should unify what each arch needs to do
> with initrd early. We need the physical address early for memblock
> reserving. Then later on we need the virtual address to access the
> initrd. Perhaps we should just change initrd_start and initrd_end to
> physical addresses (or add 2 new variables would be less invasive and
> allow for different translation than __va()). The sanity checks and
> memblock reserve could also perhaps be moved to a common location.
>
> Alternatively, given arm64 is the only oddball, I'd be fine with an
> "if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64))" condition in the default
> __early_init_dt_declare_initrd as long as we have a path to removing
> it like the above option.
I think arm64 does not have to redefine __early_init_dt_declare_initrd().
Something like this might be just all we need (completely untested,
probably it won't even compile):
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 9d9582c..e9ca238 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ s64 memstart_addr __ro_after_init = -1;
phys_addr_t arm64_dma_phys_limit __ro_after_init;
#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD
+
+static phys_addr_t initrd_start_phys, initrd_end_phys;
+
static int __init early_initrd(char *p)
{
unsigned long start, size;
@@ -71,8 +74,8 @@ static int __init early_initrd(char *p)
if (*endp == ',') {
size = memparse(endp + 1, NULL);
- initrd_start = start;
- initrd_end = start + size;
+ initrd_start_phys = start;
+ initrd_end_phys = end;
}
return 0;
}
@@ -407,14 +410,27 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
memblock_add(__pa_symbol(_text), (u64)(_end - _text));
}
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD) && initrd_start) {
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD) &&
+ (initrd_start || initrd_start_phys)) {
+ /*
+ * FIXME: ensure proper precendence between
+ * early_initrd and DT when both are present
+ */
+ if (initrd_start) {
+ initrd_start_phys = __phys_to_virt(initrd_start);
+ initrd_end_phys = __phys_to_virt(initrd_end);
+ } else if (initrd_start_phys) {
+ initrd_start = __va(initrd_start_phys);
+ initrd_end = __va(initrd_start_phys);
+ }
+
/*
* Add back the memory we just removed if it results in the
* initrd to become inaccessible via the linear mapping.
* Otherwise, this is a no-op
*/
- u64 base = initrd_start & PAGE_MASK;
- u64 size = PAGE_ALIGN(initrd_end) - base;
+ u64 base = initrd_start_phys & PAGE_MASK;
+ u64 size = PAGE_ALIGN(initrd_end_phys) - base;
/*
* We can only add back the initrd memory if we don't end up
@@ -458,7 +474,7 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
* pagetables with memblock.
*/
memblock_reserve(__pa_symbol(_text), _end - _text);
-#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD
+#if 0
if (initrd_start) {
memblock_reserve(initrd_start, initrd_end - initrd_start);
> Rob
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists