linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: Add munmap callback

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 25 Oct 2018 02:34:44 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc:     "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: Add munmap callback

On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 05:25:59PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 5:23 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> > That is actually a different problem. And you're right, we never did fix
> > that.
> >
> it is a different problem but the solution is the same: PERF_RECORD_UNMAP!

But he's not actually doing PERF_RECORD_UNMAP, nor is his perf_munmap()
hook sufficient to actually generate those.

Now I agree that if he's going to do an munmap hook, he should do it
'right' and at the very least allow for PERF_RECORD_UNMAP to be done,
but ideally simply pick up and finish that patch we had back then.