[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181025120006.GY30658@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 13:00:06 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Rafael David Tinoco <rafael.tinoco@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/zsmalloc.c: check encoded object value overflow
for PAE
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:27:44PM -0300, Rafael David Tinoco wrote:
> On 32-bit systems, zsmalloc uses HIGHMEM and, when PAE is enabled, the
> physical frame number might be so big that zsmalloc obj encoding (to
> location) will break IF architecture does not re-define
> MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS, causing:
I think there's a deeper problem here - a misunderstanding of what
MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS is.
MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS is a definition for sparsemem, and is only visible
when sparsemem is enabled. When sparsemem is disabled, asm/sparsemem.h
is not included (and should not be included) which means there is no
MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS definition.
I don't think zsmalloc.c should be (ab)using MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS, and
your description above makes it sound like you expect it to always be
defined.
If we want to have a definition for this, we shouldn't be playing
fragile games like:
#ifndef MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS
#ifdef MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS
#define MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS
#else
/*
* If this definition of MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS is used, OBJ_INDEX_BITS will just
* be PAGE_SHIFT
*/
#define MAX_POSSIBLE_PHYSMEM_BITS BITS_PER_LONG
#endif
#endif
but instead insist that MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS is defined _everywhere_.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
Powered by blists - more mailing lists