[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181025021013.GA30116@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 04:10:13 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, l.stach@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf tests: Add a test for the ARM 32-bit [vectors]
page
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 05:09:05PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> perf on ARM requires CONFIG_KUSER_HELPERS to be turned on to allow some
> independance with respect to the ARM CPU being used. Add a test which
> tries to locate the [vectors] page, created when CONFIG_KUSER_HELPERS is
> turned on to help asses the system's health.
Hi Florian
I've suffered the pain from missing CONFIG_KUSER_HELPERS. The
segfaults give little clue as to what is going wrong,and gdb is not
much use either.
What i don't see here is any clue to CONFIG_KUSER_HELPERS. If the test
fails, could you print a message suggesting CONFIG_KUSER_HELPERS on
ARM?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists