linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 3.18 51/98] clk: rockchip: fix deadlock possibility in cpuclk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181025141853.214051-51-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:18:06 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 3.18 51/98] clk: rockchip: fix deadlock possibility in cpuclk

From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>

[ Upstream commit a5e1baf7dca10f8cf945394034013260297bc416 ]

Lockdep reported a possible deadlock between the cpuclk lock and for example
the i2c driver.

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(clk_lock);
                               local_irq_disable();
                               lock(&(&i2c->lock)->rlock);
                               lock(clk_lock);
  <Interrupt>
    lock(&(&i2c->lock)->rlock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

The generic clock-types of the core ccf already use spin_lock_irqsave when
touching clock registers, so do the same for the cpuclk.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
[mturquette@...aro.org: removed initialization of "flags"]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-cpu.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-cpu.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-cpu.c
index 75c8c45ef728..8539c4fd34cc 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-cpu.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-cpu.c
@@ -124,10 +124,11 @@ static int rockchip_cpuclk_pre_rate_change(struct rockchip_cpuclk *cpuclk,
 {
 	const struct rockchip_cpuclk_reg_data *reg_data = cpuclk->reg_data;
 	unsigned long alt_prate, alt_div;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	alt_prate = clk_get_rate(cpuclk->alt_parent);
 
-	spin_lock(cpuclk->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(cpuclk->lock, flags);
 
 	/*
 	 * If the old parent clock speed is less than the clock speed
@@ -164,7 +165,7 @@ static int rockchip_cpuclk_pre_rate_change(struct rockchip_cpuclk *cpuclk,
 			cpuclk->reg_base + reg_data->core_reg);
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock(cpuclk->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(cpuclk->lock, flags);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -173,6 +174,7 @@ static int rockchip_cpuclk_post_rate_change(struct rockchip_cpuclk *cpuclk,
 {
 	const struct rockchip_cpuclk_reg_data *reg_data = cpuclk->reg_data;
 	const struct rockchip_cpuclk_rate_table *rate;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	rate = rockchip_get_cpuclk_settings(cpuclk, ndata->new_rate);
 	if (!rate) {
@@ -181,7 +183,7 @@ static int rockchip_cpuclk_post_rate_change(struct rockchip_cpuclk *cpuclk,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	spin_lock(cpuclk->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(cpuclk->lock, flags);
 
 	if (ndata->old_rate < ndata->new_rate)
 		rockchip_cpuclk_set_dividers(cpuclk, rate);
@@ -201,7 +203,7 @@ static int rockchip_cpuclk_post_rate_change(struct rockchip_cpuclk *cpuclk,
 	if (ndata->old_rate > ndata->new_rate)
 		rockchip_cpuclk_set_dividers(cpuclk, rate);
 
-	spin_unlock(cpuclk->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(cpuclk->lock, flags);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1