linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: ad7780: update voltage on read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181025145520.GA16950@himanshu-Vostro-3559>
Date:   Thu, 25 Oct 2018 20:25:20 +0530
From:   Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>
To:     Renato Lui Geh <renatogeh@...il.com>
Cc:     Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com,
        jic23@...nel.org, knaack.h@....de, pmeerw@...erw.net,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, alexandru.Ardelean@...log.com,
        stefan.popa@...log.com, giuliano.belinassi@....br,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-usp@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: ad7780: update voltage on read

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 11:26:36AM -0300, Renato Lui Geh wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for the quick review. :)
> 
> > But please create one patch per issue and do not put unrelated changes into
> > the same patch.
> 
> Should I resend this patch as a patchset containing the two changes?

Yes! "One patch per change policy"

> > Also your mail client seems to have replaced tabs in the patch with spaces,
> > this means the patch will not apply cleanly. Check the
> > Documentation/email-clients.txt file for some hints how to configure your
> > mail client so it will not break patches.
> 
> From my end my original email patch appears to have tabs instead of
> spaces. I redownloaded my email and vim shows that the indentation has
> the ^I tab characters. But when downloading your reply it was converted
> to spaces. Am I missing something?

Your patch applies fine.

I think the problem is on Lars end due to Thunderbird.

In the meantime, you can verify the patch using:

$ git am <your_patch.patch>

Also, you can try to use `git send-email` to send patches.


-- 
Himanshu Jha
Undergraduate Student
Department of Electronics & Communication
Guru Tegh Bahadur Institute of Technology