[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANk1AXTm3G-xLz6nEeBh+JGLxF91Cn1-w=J+vKKM2qz1sqLXbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:25:08 -0500
From: Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/18] of: overlay: validation checks, subsequent fixes
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 2:57 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 4:25 PM Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:48 PM <frowand.list@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
> > >
> > > Add checks to (1) overlay apply process and (2) memory freeing
> > > triggered by overlay release. The checks are intended to detect
> > > possible memory leaks and invalid overlays.
> >
> > I've tested v5, nothing new to report.
>
> Does that mean everything broken or everything works great? In the
> latter case, care to give a Tested-by.
>
> Rob
Tested-by: Alan Tull <atull@...nel.org>
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists