[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2DBgfvXs-9KzoDvbQpV+VN96xb7xHG-5=NDDgnt7ViVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 17:30:26 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Przemyslaw Sroka <psroka@...ence.com>,
Arkadiusz Golec <agolec@...ence.com>,
Alan Douglas <adouglas@...ence.com>,
Bartosz Folta <bfolta@...ence.com>,
Damian Kos <dkos@...ence.com>,
Alicja Jurasik-Urbaniak <alicja@...ence.com>,
Cyprian Wronka <cwronka@...ence.com>,
Suresh Punnoose <sureshp@...ence.com>,
Rafal Ciepiela <rafalc@...ence.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vitor Soares <Vitor.Soares@...opsys.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Xiang Lin <Xiang.Lin@...aptics.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
Przemyslaw Gaj <pgaj@...ence.com>,
Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Mike Shettel <mshettel@...eaurora.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 6/9] i3c: master: Add driver for Cadence IP
On 10/24/18, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com> wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 15:34:01 +0200
> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
>
>> +
>> +static void cdns_i3c_master_rd_from_rx_fifo(struct cdns_i3c_master
>> *master,
>> + u8 *bytes, int nbytes)
>> +{
>> + readsl(master->regs + RX_FIFO, bytes, nbytes / 4);
>
> Vitor reported a problem with readsl(): this function expects the 2nd
> argument to be aligned on 32-bit, which is not guaranteed here. Unless
> you see a better solution, I'll switch back to a loop doing:
>
> for (i = 0; i < nbytes; i += 4) {
> u32 tmp = __raw_readl(...);
> memcpy(bytes + i, &tmp,
> nbytes - i > 4 ? 4 : nbytes - i);
> }
Could we maybe mandate that the buffer itself must be aligned here?
What would be a reason why we see an unaligned target buffer?
The open-coded loop should generally work (maybe a little slower),
but it does seem error-prone to use __raw_readl() in general.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists