linux-kernel - Regression: OOPs on boot due to "wlcore: Add support for optional wakeirq"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALAqxLVOEVP2g6tPc1RF8mEgfffwWVHSuwrvv_a+oB2d0Jp8rg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:04:32 -0700
From:   John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Eyal Reizer <eyalr@...com>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: Regression: OOPs on boot due to "wlcore: Add support for optional wakeirq"

Hey Tony,
  In testing linus/master on my hikey board, I'm hitting the following
OOPS on bootup:

[    1.870279] Unable to handle kernel read from unreadable memory at
virtual address 0000000000000010
[    1.870283] Mem abort info:
[    1.870287]   ESR = 0x96000005
[    1.870292]   Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[    1.870296]   SET = 0, FnV = 0
[    1.870299]   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
[    1.870302] Data abort info:
[    1.870306]   ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005
[    1.870309]   CM = 0, WnR = 0
[    1.870312] [0000000000000010] user address but active_mm is swapper
[    1.870318] Internal error: Oops: 96000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[    1.870327] CPU: 0 PID: 5 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted
4.19.0-05129-gb3d1e8e #48
[    1.870331] Hardware name: HiKey Development Board (DT)
[    1.870350] Workqueue: events_freezable mmc_rescan
[    1.870358] pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO)
[    1.870366] pc : wl1271_probe+0x210/0x350
[    1.870371] lr : wl1271_probe+0x210/0x350
[    1.870374] sp : ffffff80080739b0
[    1.870377] x29: ffffff80080739b0 x28: 0000000000000000
[    1.870384] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000
[    1.870391] x25: 0000000000000036 x24: ffffffc074ecb598
[    1.870398] x23: ffffffc07ffdce78 x22: ffffffc0744ed808
[    1.870404] x21: ffffffc074ecbb98 x20: ffffff8008ff9000
[    1.870411] x19: ffffffc0744ed800 x18: ffffff8008ff9a48
[    1.870418] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
[    1.870425] x15: ffffffc074ecb503 x14: ffffffffffffffff
[    1.870431] x13: ffffffc074ecb502 x12: 0000000000000030
[    1.870438] x11: 0101010101010101 x10: 0000000000000040
[    1.870444] x9 : ffffffc075400248 x8 : ffffffc075400270
[    1.870451] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 0000000000000000
[    1.870457] x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000
[    1.870463] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000
[    1.870469] x1 : 0000000000000028 x0 : 0000000000000000
[    1.870477] Process kworker/0:0 (pid: 5, stack limit = 0x(____ptrval____))
[    1.870480] Call trace:
[    1.870485]  wl1271_probe+0x210/0x350
[    1.870491]  sdio_bus_probe+0x100/0x128
[    1.870500]  really_probe+0x1a8/0x2b8
[    1.870506]  driver_probe_device+0x58/0x100
[    1.870511]  __device_attach_driver+0x94/0xd8
[    1.870517]  bus_for_each_drv+0x70/0xc8
[    1.870522]  __device_attach+0xe0/0x140
[    1.870527]  device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
[    1.870532]  bus_probe_device+0x94/0xa0
[    1.870537]  device_add+0x374/0x5b8
[    1.870542]  sdio_add_func+0x60/0x88
[    1.870546]  mmc_attach_sdio+0x1b0/0x358
[    1.870551]  mmc_rescan+0x2cc/0x390
[    1.870558]  process_one_work+0x12c/0x320
[    1.870563]  worker_thread+0x48/0x458
[    1.870569]  kthread+0xf8/0x128
[    1.870575]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
[    1.870583] Code: 92400c21 b2760021 a90687a2 97e95bf9 (f9400803)
[    1.870587] ---[ end trace 1e15f81d3c139ca9 ]---


I've bisected it down to 3c83dd577c7f ("wlcore: Add support for
optional wakeirq").

It seems since we don't have a wakeirq value in the dts, the wakeirq
value in wl1271_probe() is zero, which then causes trouble in
irqd_get_trigger_type(irq_get_irq_data(wakeirq)).

Should we check wakeirq before we set the second elements of res[]?

thanks
-john