[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHLCerNKw3_1E0Yoi-jq=hextG=xbbjU3=P=-25zeyc0MdmjxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:55:32 +0530
From: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
To: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, arm@...nel.org,
khilman@...libre.com, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Qualcomm ARM64 DT updates for 4.20
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 7:59 PM Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 11:30:29AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 8:38 PM Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > The following changes since commit 5b394b2ddf0347bef56e50c69a58773c94343ff3:
> > >
> > > Linux 4.19-rc1 (2018-08-26 14:11:59 -0700)
> > >
> > > are available in the git repository at:
> > >
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/agross/linux.git tags/qcom-arm64-for-4.20
> > >
> > > for you to fetch changes up to 6db0483cf622fc690e32e0804f8b86061f13962a:
> > >
> > > Revert "dt-bindings: thermal: qcom-spmi-temp-alarm: Fix documentation of 'reg'" (2018-09-30 12:59:52 -0500)
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Qualcomm ARM64 Updates for v4.20
> > >
> > > * Update Coresight for MSM8916
> > > * Switch to use mailbox for smp2p and smd on MSM8996
> > > * Add dispcc, dsp, USB, regulator, and other nodes for SDM845
> > > * Drop model/compatible from MSM8916 and MSM8996
> > > * Add compat for db820c
> > > * Add MSM8998 SoC and board support along with associated nodes
> > > * Add RESIN/PON for Qualcomm PM8916 and PM8994
> >
> > Pulled into next/dt, thanks.
> >
> > There is a small chance that the two reverts end up causing more
> > problems than they help: they might conflict with the patches merged
> > into the iio branch, or they could end up being applied on top of
> > the iio branch and revert the changes during the release. I think
> > it will be fine, but it's obviously better to avoid this.
> >
>
> Agreed, I'll check in on this once -rc1 hits to make sure they weren't removed.
Andy,
While you acked the tsens thermal DT patches[1] so they could go
through the thermal tree[2] to avoid a dependency, Eduardo would
prefer the DT changes for tsens to go through the arch tree.
To avoid a scenario where these DT changes don't get merged until the
next merge window, would you or arm-soc maintainers consider merging
them in -rc2 (after the thermal-soc tree gets merged)?
For convenience, I've provided just the DT changes with all tags in a
separate branch on top of v4.19 here:
https://git.linaro.org/people/amit.kucheria/kernel.git/log/?h=up/thermal/tsens-preirq-cleanup-v4
Regards,
Amit
[1] Here is a reference to the patch series with Andy's acks:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1536744310.git.amit.kucheria@linaro.org/T/
[2] Here is a link to Eduardo's tree containing a subset of the above
series (I don't yet see a pull request):
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/evalenti/linux-soc-thermal.git/log/?h=linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists