lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2eOo=9Pv4XmyX30_PYoRpp_f6rXQn+pk9z21wMvE84Ag@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Oct 2018 09:36:30 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>
Cc:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        "linux-mips@...ux-mips.org" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 33/46] MIPS: Workaround GCC
 __builtin_unreachable reordering bug

On 10/25/18, Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:10:40AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> From: Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/mips/Kconfig                |  1 +
>>  arch/mips/include/asm/compiler.h | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
>
> In principle I'm fine with backporting this - it does fix broken builds.
>
> It's only going to be of any use though if you also backport commit
> 04f264d3a8b0 ("compiler.h: Allow arch-specific asm/compiler.h"). I'd
> recommend backporting both or neither.
>
> In practice I think it's unlikely anyone will need a microMIPS kernel &
> be tied to the particular versions affected by the bug this patch fixed,
> so I don't think it's a problem to backport neither.

I think the current practice of the stable kernel these days is to take
both patches in this case: They fix an actual bug in the mainline kernel,
and it seems unlikely enough that they cause a regression if backported,
so putting them into 4.14 has more advantages than disadvantages.


       Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ