[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5BD2E2DB.5090305@st.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 09:48:11 +0000
From: Pascal PAILLET-LME <p.paillet@...com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
"Guenter Roeck" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LINUX-WATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] dt-bindings: mfd: document stpmic1
Hello Lee,
Le 10/26/2018 08:46 AM, Lee Jones a écrit :
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Rob Herring wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 4:44 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> Rob: please grep your name for some feedback.
> [Moved to the top]
>
>>> I'm surprised Rob allowed you to add register bits in a DT property?
>> Yeah, they are certainly questionable and not something we encourage,
>> but the alternative would be dozens of properties which only apply for
>> this one device and just get translated back to register values.
> I don't see how this device is any different to the 100's of devices
> which are already supported in DT.
>
>>> On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Pascal PAILLET-LME wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: pascal paillet <p.paillet@...com>
>>>> +Optional parent device properties:
>>>> +- st,main-control-register:
>>>> + -bit 1: Power cycling will be performed on turn OFF condition
>>>> + -bit 2: PWRCTRL is functional
>>>> + -bit 3: PWRCTRL active high
>>>> +- st,pads-pull-register:
>>>> + -bit 1: WAKEUP pull down is not active
>>>> + -bit 2: PWRCTRL pull up is active
>>>> + -bit 3: PWRCTRL pull down is active
>>>> + -bit 4: WAKEUP detector is disabled
> This should be part of the Pinctrl configuration/driver.
>
> And Pinctrl probably already has properties for this?
I will remove this in the next version.
>>>> +- st,vin-control-register:
>>>> + -bit 0: VINLOW monitoring is enabled
>>>> + -bit [1...3]: VINLOW rising threshold
>>>> + 000 VINOK_f + 50mV
>>>> + 001 VINOK_f + 100mV
>>>> + 010 VINOK_f + 150mV
>>>> + 011 VINOK_f + 200mV
>>>> + 100 VINOK_f + 250mV
>>>> + 101 VINOK_f + 300mV
>>>> + 110 VINOK_f + 350mV
>>>> + 111 VINOK_f + 400mV
>>>> + -bit [4...5]: VINLOW hyst
>>>> + 00 100mV
>>>> + 01 200mV
>>>> + 10 300mV
>>>> + 11 400mV
>>>> + -bit 6: SW_OUT detector is disabled
>>>> + -bit 7: SW_IN detector is enabled.
> This should be part of the Regulator configuration/driver?
I will also remove this in the next version. I think this could be
handled by an hardware monitor future driver.
>>>> +- st,usb-control-register:
>>>> + -bit 3: SW_OUT current limit
>>>> + 0: 600mA
>>>> + 1: 1.1A
>>>> + -bit 4: VBUS_OTG discharge is enabled
>>>> + -bit 5: SW_OUT discharge is enabled
>>>> + -bit 6: VBUS_OTG detection is enabled
>>>> + -bit 7: BOOST_OVP is disabled
> This should be part of the USB configuration/driver?
>
I will also remove this in the next version. And I'm going to add active
discharge ops in the regulator driver.
Thank you !
pascal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists