[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHLCerOqgLep=sPvODyEY8sUr=xxkVU+BkWU5ipTX6w_j6dWtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 18:09:58 +0530
From: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
Markus Mayer <mmayer@...adcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Jun Nie <jun.nie@...aro.org>,
Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/17] thermal: qcom: tsens: enable+check sensor after
its setup is finished
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 5:41 PM Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 9:24 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com> wrote:
> >
> > Enable+check sensor after setting tmdev->sensor[i].tzd and calling
> > chipset specific enable operation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> > index dbd2556..01bff96 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/tsens.c
> > @@ -105,13 +105,13 @@ static int tsens_register(struct tsens_device *tmdev)
> > if (IS_ERR(tzd))
> > continue;
> >
> > - thermal_zone_set_mode(tzd, THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED);
> > - thermal_zone_device_check(tzd);
> > -
>
> I don't quite understand why you're making this move explicitly in a
> separate patch for each of the drivers? You added it here in patch 4
> in the first place, why not add it in the correct place there itself?
I think I understand now. You wanted to separate patches causing
functional changes from ones that didn't.
IMHO, it makes the series a bit hard to read but I have no better
suggestion than to squash everything (patches 3-16), but that will
make it harder to collect Acks.
> > tmdev->sensor[i].tzd = tzd;
> >
> > if (tmdev->ops->enable)
> > tmdev->ops->enable(tmdev, i);
> > +
> > + thermal_zone_set_mode(tzd, THERMAL_DEVICE_ENABLED);
> > + thermal_zone_device_check(tzd);
> >
> > }
> > return 0;
> > }
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists