lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1540562267-101152-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Oct 2018 21:57:47 +0800
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will.deacon@....com>
CC:     <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] arm64/numa: Add more vetting in numa_set_distance()

Currently it is acceptable to set the distance between 2 separate nodes to
LOCAL_DISTANCE.

Reject this as it is invalid.

This change avoids a crash reported in [1].

[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg683304.html

Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>

diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
index 146c04c..6092e3d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
@@ -335,7 +335,8 @@ void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance)
 	}
 
 	if ((u8)distance != distance ||
-	    (from == to && distance != LOCAL_DISTANCE)) {
+	    (from == to && distance != LOCAL_DISTANCE) ||
+	    (from != to && distance == LOCAL_DISTANCE)) {
 		pr_warn_once("Warning: invalid distance parameter, from=%d to=%d distance=%d\n",
 			     from, to, distance);
 		return;
-- 
1.9.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ