linux-kernel - Re: The linux devs can rescind their license grant.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <2835-Fri26Oct2018115320-0400-eben@harlan.sflc-vpn>
Date:   Fri, 26 Oct 2018 11:53:20 -0400
From:   Eben Moglen <moglen@...umbia.edu>
To:     esr@...rsus.com
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, visionsofalice@...chan.it,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rms@....org, bruce@...ens.com,
        bkuhn@...onservancy.org, editor@....net, neil@...wn.name,
        labbott@...hat.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        olof@...om.net, clm@...com, mishi@...ux.com,
        linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The linux devs can rescind their license grant.

On Friday, 26 October 2018, Eric S. Raymond wrote:

  Eben Moglen <moglen@...umbia.edu>:
  >  reputational damage is *specifically* recognized as grounds for relief.
  >   
  > No.  Reputational damage is not mentioned at all, let alone
  > specifically recognized.
  
  I have no difficulty in finding the word "reputation" in the brief in
  in proximity with the phrase "increasing [the programmer's]
  recognition i

The parties' briefs are not the court opinion, and don't represent
what was decided.  Wrong document.  I linked to the opinion in my
message.

Eben