linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 6/6] Revert "pstore/ram_core: Do not reset restored zone's position and size"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 26 Oct 2018 20:42:12 +0100
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
        Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 6/6] Revert "pstore/ram_core: Do not reset restored zone's
 position and size"

On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 7:22 PM, Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 07:16:28PM +0100, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 7:00 PM, Joel Fernandes (Google)
>> <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:
>> > This reverts commit 25b63da64708212985c06c7f8b089d356efdd9cf.
>> >
>> > Due to the commit which is being reverted here, it is not possible to
>> > know if pstore's messages were from a previous boot, or from very old
>> > boots. This creates an awkard situation where its unclear if crash or
>> > other logs are from the previous boot or from very old boots. Also
>> > typically we dump the pstore buffers after one reboot and are interested
>> > in only the previous boot's crash so let us reset the buffer after we
>> > save them.
>> >
>> > Lastly, if we don't zap them, then I think it is possible that part of
>> > the buffer will be from this boot and the other parts will be from
>> > previous boots. So this revert fixes all of this by calling
>> > persistent_ram_zap always.
>>
>> I like the other patches (comments coming), but not this one: it's
>> very intentional to keep all crashes around until they're explicitly
>> unlinked from the pstore filesystem from userspace. Especially true
>> for catching chains of kernel crashes, or a failed log collection,
>> etc. Surviving multiple reboots is the expected behavior on Chrome OS
>> too.
>
> Oh, ok. Hence the RFC tag ;-) We can drop this one then. I forgot that
> unlinking was another way to clear the logs.

In another thread I discovered that the "single prz" ones actually
_are_ zapped at boot. I didn't realize, but it explains why pmsg would
vanish on me sometimes. ;) I always thought I was just doing something
wrong with it. (And I wonder if it's actually a bug that pmsg is
zapped -- console doesn't matter: it's overwritten every boot by
design.)

-- 
Kees Cook