linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client changes for Linux 4.20.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bafa9f6ca7da84e710bc9e1af8fa7428a8331bb6.camel@hammerspace.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Oct 2018 20:20:54 +0000
From:   Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...merspace.com>
To:     "torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull NFS client changes for Linux 4.20.

On Fri, 2018-10-26 at 13:10 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 8:45 AM Trond Myklebust <
> trondmy@...merspace.com> wrote:
> > 
> > NFS client updates for Linux 4.20
> 
> Pulled.

Thank you!

> Btw, just out of curiosity - is there some pattern to when I get the
> pull requests from you vs Anna? Or is it just "whoever happens to
> have
> the baton"? Not that it matters, but I was wondering if there was
> some
> logic to it that I've missed..

We agreed about a year or so ago to take turns maintaining the linux-
next branches. So in practice that means Anna has been sending you the
pull requests for the odd kernel minor numbers, and I've been sending
you the ones for the even numbers.
We still share the burden of reviewing the code, though, so if
something slips through the cracks, we get to share the blame... ☺

Cheers
  Trond

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer, Hammerspace
trond.myklebust@...merspace.com