[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181027105808.60bfba7d@vmware.local.home>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 10:58:08 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86: ptrace: Add function argument access API
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 11:21:28 -0700
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 9:26 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Anyone have any issues with this patch?
> >
>
> I'm conceptually okay with it. That being said,
> regs_within_kernel_stack(), which you're indirectly using, is
> off-by-a-few. And updating it to use probe_kernel_read() might be
> nice for robustness.
>
A patch to protect regs_within_kernel_stack() with
probe_kernel_read() has already been accepted. Can someone give an
Acked-by on this patch? As it does touch x86.
Thanks!
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists