lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <nycvar.YFH.7.76.1810280000440.23511@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date:   Sun, 28 Oct 2018 00:09:44 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To:     Tim.Bird@...y.com
cc:     viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, visionsofalice@...chan.it,
        linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org, rms@....org,
        ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, mishi@...ux.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, bruce@...ens.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, esr@...rsus.com, moglen@...umbia.edu,
        bkuhn@...onservancy.org, neil@...wn.name, editor@....net
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] The linux devs can rescind their license
 grant.

On Sat, 27 Oct 2018, Tim.Bird@...y.com wrote:

> Al,
>
> Can you please, even in the face of comments you find irritating, keep 
> your responses more civil?  Calling someone a "wankstain" is 
> unprofessional

Tim,

to be completely honest, communicating anonymously doesn't really match my 
"this is highly professional" standards either, so I don't think we should 
be losing too much sleep over this particular e-mail exchange.

CoC explicitly requires us to be reasonably nice to the human being on the 
other end of the wire, which I whole-heartedly believe is a very noble and 
nice goal. But you really have to know at least a little bit who's there 
on the other end. Otherwise failure to communicate might be sort of 
inevitable.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ