linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] XArray for 4.20

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=whygsqzudQZMNdYuYCcOaM-04f-O7ir73weF9g5Fzh33w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 28 Oct 2018 12:21:19 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     willy@...radead.org
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] XArray for 4.20

On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 12:13 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 11:50:19AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > NOTE! I did get some conflicts with other stuff, and while the
> > conflict resolution all looked pretty straightforward, this does want
> > looking at.
> >
> > Particularly the mm/workingset.c code.
>
> I've been rebasing the xarray-conv branch on your tree pretty regularly
> this week, so I have a fairly good idea how I think it should look.
> I'll check to see if you & I have the same thoughts when you push it out.

It's pushed out now. I'm running the kernel now, but have done only
basic boot testing (in addition to my usual build tests), no real
stress-tests.

                          Linus