[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181028112728.GD8826@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 11:27:28 +0000
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Which SPDX Identifier for files without explicit GPL version
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 11:04:06AM +0100, Michael Straube wrote:
> Hi,
>
> which GPL version should be used in SPDX Identifiers for files that
> are GPL licensed but do not mention any version? It is not clear to
> me after reading license-rules.rst.
>
> For example:
>
> /******************************************************************************
> * Copyright(c) 2008 - 2010 Realtek Corporation. All rights reserved.
> *
> * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
> * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
> * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for
> * more details.
> *
> * The full GNU General Public License is included in this distribution in the
> * file called LICENSE.
Perhaps look up what version of the GPL that was originally contained in
the tarball that this driver was bundled with? I think that should be
on their website somewhere...
If not, it's v1, not a good thing, but all we have to go on. Also, try
emailing:
> * Contact Information:
> * wlanfae <wlanfae@...ltek.com>
That address :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists