lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 11:27:28 +0000 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: Michael Straube <straube.linux@...il.com> Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Which SPDX Identifier for files without explicit GPL version On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 11:04:06AM +0100, Michael Straube wrote: > Hi, > > which GPL version should be used in SPDX Identifiers for files that > are GPL licensed but do not mention any version? It is not clear to > me after reading license-rules.rst. > > For example: > > /****************************************************************************** > * Copyright(c) 2008 - 2010 Realtek Corporation. All rights reserved. > * > * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT > * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or > * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for > * more details. > * > * The full GNU General Public License is included in this distribution in the > * file called LICENSE. Perhaps look up what version of the GPL that was originally contained in the tarball that this driver was bundled with? I think that should be on their website somewhere... If not, it's v1, not a good thing, but all we have to go on. Also, try emailing: > * Contact Information: > * wlanfae <wlanfae@...ltek.com> That address :) thanks, greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists