linux-kernel - Re: XFS: Hang and dmesg flood on mounting invalid FS image

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181029012058.GK19305@dastard>
Date:   Mon, 29 Oct 2018 12:20:59 +1100
From:   Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:     Anatoly Trosinenko <anatoly.trosinenko@...il.com>
Cc:     "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: XFS: Hang and dmesg flood on mounting invalid FS image

On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 08:50:46PM +0300, Anatoly Trosinenko wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> When mounting a broken XFS image, the kernel hangs and floods dmesg
> with stack traces.

How did the corruption occur?

$ sudo xfs_logprint -d /dev/vdc
xfs_logprint:
    data device: 0xfd20
    log device: 0xfd20 daddr: 131112 length: 6840

     0 HEADER Cycle 1 tail 1:000000 len    512 ops 1
[00000 - 00000] Cycle 0xffffffff New Cycle 0x00000001
     2 HEADER Cycle 1 tail 1:000002 len    512 ops 5
     4 HEADER Cycle 1 tail -2147483647:000002 len    512 ops 1
                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^
     6 HEADER Cycle 0 tail 1:000000 len      0 ops 0
[00000 - 00006] Cycle 0x00000001 New Cycle 0x00000000
     7 HEADER Cycle 0 tail 1:000000 len      0 ops 0

Ok, so from this the head of the log is block 4, and it has a
corrupt tail pointer it points to:


$ sudo xfs_logprint -D -s 4 /dev/vdc |head -10
xfs_logprint:
    data device: 0xfd20
    log device: 0xfd20 daddr: 131112 length: 6840

BLKNO: 4
 0 bebaedfe  1000000  2000000    20000  1000000  3610000  1000080  2000000 
                                                 ^^^^^^^       ^   ^
						 wrong       wrong wrong

 8 2f27bae6  2000000  1000000 dabdbab0        0        0        0        0 
10        0        0        0        0        0        0        0        0 
18        0        0        0        0        0        0        0        0 
20        0        0        0        0        0        0        0        0 

They decode as:

cycle: 1        version: 2              lsn: 1,24835    tail_lsn: 2147483649,2

So the tail LSN points to an invalid log cycle and the previous
block. IOWs, the block number in the tail indicates the whole log is
valid and needs to be scanned. but the cycle is not valid.

And that's the problem. Neither the head or tail blocks are
validated before they are used. CRC checking of the head and tail
blocks comes later....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com