lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <381b8ca1faa35182cf57182a98484174f1b3d939.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Sun, 28 Oct 2018 19:04:58 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Steffen Vogel <post@...ffenvogel.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] w1: fix whitespaces of struct declarations

On Mon, 2018-10-29 at 03:02 +0100, Steffen Vogel wrote:
> Hi Joe,
> 
> v2 of this patch set is almost ready.
> I reran checkpatch.pl with '--strict'. So more warnings will be fixed by
> the second version.
> 
> See my comments below.
> 
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 06:52:23PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sun, 2018-10-28 at 23:09 +0100, Steffen Vogel wrote:
> > > This fixes a warning raised by the checkpatch tool.
> > 
> > checkpatch does not raise any whitespace errors on
> > this file.
> > 
> > It does suggest that braces could be moved.
> 
> Ah okay, I considered moving a brace also a whitespace change.
> Do you prefer the original indention of the struct members?
> I dont see it very often in kernel code.

The indentation doesn't matter to me.

The commit message description of a checkpatch warning
that does not exist is incorrect.



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ