linux-kernel - Re: UI messages in event thread hangs perf top

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181029122528.GA20813@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 29 Oct 2018 09:25:28 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kan.liang@...el.com
Subject: Re: UI messages in event thread hangs perf top

Em Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 08:58:30PM -0700, David Miller escreveu:
> 
> If I run perf top with a "make -j128" kernel build, I get ring buffer event
> processing timeouts which results in:
> 
> 		ui__warning("Too slow to read ring buffer.\n"
> 			    "Please try increasing the period (-c) or\n"
> 			    "decreasing the freq (-F) or\n"
> 			    "limiting the number of CPUs (-C)\n");
> 
> from perf_top__mmap_read().
> 
> This hangs the main event thread.  Only the display thread runs after
> this point.
> 
> We can't issue UI messages from the event thread, because those will
> hang waiting for a keypress.  The display thread will eat any keys
> we press and the event thread thus hangs forever.
> 
> I can tell this is what has happened because the histogram entries
> continue to decay, yet the event count stops increasing.
> 
> If I put a gdb on the perf process, indeed the backtrace in the event
> processing thread is in the select() call done by ui__getch().
> 
> Adding insult to injury, the display thread immediately overwrites the
> warning message printed by the event thread, and thus the user has no
> chance to even see it.
> 
> I really wonder how this was tested.
> 
> Perhaps we should mark the event thread in a special way and trigger
> assertions if UI messages are printed from it.  Again, any such
> operation will hang the thread and stop all event processing.

Right, I thought about marking a flag in the main event thread that then
gets picked up by the display thread, I'll try and write a patch for
that, if none has been submitted, I'm still downloading this weekend's
messages.

- Arnaldo

P.S. I was busy working as a volunteer in the brazilian elections :-\