[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAB9dFdtLHkpZqrmNEuMfPdOmZm32q5SXYx1zMexSd94rt3KyDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 09:58:28 -0300
From: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>
To: jgross@...e.com
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: x86/paravirt: Use a single ops structure
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 2:37 PM Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Commit: 5c83511bdb9832c86be20fb86b783356e2f58062
> Parent: 27876f3882fdd4acb3d3614a0133ecdc777fc292
> Refname: refs/heads/master
> Web: https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/5c83511bdb9832c86be20fb86b783356e2f58062
> Author: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
> AuthorDate: Tue Aug 28 09:40:19 2018 +0200
> Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> CommitDate: Mon Sep 3 16:50:35 2018 +0200
>
> x86/paravirt: Use a single ops structure
>
> Instead of using six globally visible paravirt ops structures combine
> them in a single structure, keeping the original structures as
> sub-structures.
>
> This avoids the need to assemble struct paravirt_patch_template at
> runtime on the stack each time apply_paravirt() is being called (i.e.
> when loading a module).
The above commit replaces pv_lock_ops, which was EXPORT_SYMBOL, with
something that is part of pv_ops, which is EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. When
CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS is set, this has the side effect of making
spin_lock() unusable by out of tree modules, which will likely be an
issue for many, if not most of them.
Marc
Powered by blists - more mailing lists