[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ddb1052-e481-022e-e9cb-7a09d75f6667@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 19:00:41 +0530
From: AnilKumar Chimata <anilc@...eaurora.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: andy.gross@...aro.org, david.brown@...aro.org,
mark.rutland@....com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: Add ICE device specific parameters
Hi Rob,
Thanks for the comments,
On 2018-10-25 23:45, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 08:47:55PM +0530, AnilKumar Chimata wrote:
>> Add dt parameters information specific to the Inline
>> Crypto Engine (ICE) device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: AnilKumar Chimata <anilc@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/crypto/msm/ice.txt | 34
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/msm/ice.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/msm/ice.txt
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/msm/ice.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..86eed5e
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/msm/ice.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
>> +* Inline Crypto Engine (ICE)
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> + - compatible : should be "qcom,ice"
>
> Only 1 version ever? Probably not and this needs an SoC specific
> compatible string. Does this follow any standard or ICE is a QCom
> thing?
Yes, currently one version and in future we might have to add if there
are any hardware specific changes and this is Qualcomm specific hardware.
>
>> + - reg : <register mapping>
>
> No need to define standard properties. You need to say how many
> register
> ranges.
Changed.
>
>> +
>> +Optional properties:
>> + - interrupt-names : name describing the interrupts for ICE IRQ
>
> No point to this if there is only 1 IRQ.
There are two IRQ lines which hardware can support one for non-secure
operating system and another for secure operating system.
>
>> + - interrupts : <interrupt mapping for ICE IRQ>
>> + - qcom,enable-ice-clk : should enable clocks for ICE HW
>
> This shouldn't be needed.
Changed.
>
>> + - clocks : List of phandle and clock specifier pairs
>> + - clock-names : List of clock input name strings sorted in
>> the same
>> + order as the clocks property.
>
> How many? You need to give the
Currently four clocks are needed, details updated accordingly.
>> + - qcom,op-freq-hz : max clock speed sorted in the same order
>> as the clocks
>> + property.
>
> Use the assigned-clocks properties for this.
Actually that is not a max clock speed, its any array of operating
frequencies which ICE can support.
>
>> + - qcom,instance-type : describe the storage type for which ICE
>> node is defined
>> + currently, only "ufs" and "sdcc" are supported storage type
>
> What if there is more than one instance of ufs or SD? Do you need to
> know which ICE goes with which controller?
That is right, needs to have multiple device node entries which
differentiate between storage instances.
>
>> + - power-domains : regulator supply to be used by ICE HW
>> +
>> +Example:
>> + ufs_ice: ufsice@...0000 {
>
> crytpo@...
>
>> + compatible = "qcom,ice";
>> + reg = <0x1d90000 0x8000>;
>> + qcom,enable-ice-clk;
>> + clock-names = "ufs_core_clk", "bus_clk",
>> + "iface_clk", "ice_core_clk";
>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
>> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_MEM_CLKREF_CLK>,
>> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AHB_CLK>,
>> + <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_ICE_CORE_CLK>;
>> + qcom,op-freq-hz = <0>, <0>, <0>, <300000000>;
>> + power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
>> + qcom,instance-type = "ufs";
>> + };
>> --
>> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
>> Forum,
>> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists