linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHES/RFC] Re: A concern about overflow ring buffer mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Oct 2018 13:42:56 -0400
From:   "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wangnan0@...wei.com,
        jolsa@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org, kan.liang@...el.com,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, yao.jin@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES/RFC] Re: A concern about overflow ring buffer mode



On 10/29/2018 1:40 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 10:33:06 -0400
> 
>> I just realized that the problem in KNL will be back if we switch
>> back to non-overwrite mode.
> 
> What is KNL?
>
Intel Xeon Phi Processor, Knights Landing.

Thanks,
Kan