lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b3eb10e-c492-dc77-cbe6-3a3e692326d7@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Oct 2018 20:01:42 +0200
From:   Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@...il.com>
To:     Ahmed Abd El Mawgood <ahmedsoliman0x666@...il.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ovich00@...il.com, kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
        nigel.edwards@....com, Boris Lukashev <blukashev@...pervictus.com>,
        Hossam Hassan <7ossam9063@...il.com>,
        Ahmed Lotfy <A7med.lotfey@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/5] KVM: X86: Introducing ROE Protection Kernel
 Hardening

Hi,

On 26/10/2018 16:12, Ahmed Abd El Mawgood wrote:

> This is the 5th version which is 4th version with minor fixes. ROE is a
> hypercall that enables host operating system to restrict guest's access to its
> own memory. This will provide a hardening mechanism that can be used to stop
> rootkits from manipulating kernel static data structures and code. Once a memory
> region is protected the guest kernel can't even request undoing the protection.

This is very interesting, because it seems a very good match to the work 
I'm doing, for supporting the creation of more targets for protection:

https://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2018/10/23/3

In my case the protection would extend also to write-rate type of data.
There is an open problem of identifying legitimate write-rare 
operations, however it should be possible to provide at least a certain 
degree of confidence.

--

igor

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ