[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <FFF73D592F13FD46B8700F0A279B802F485E5596@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:38:01 +0000
From: "Prakhya, Sai Praneeth" <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 1/2] x86/efi: Unmap EFI boot services code/data
regions from efi_pgd
> > /*
> > * The testcases use internal knowledge of the implementation that shouldn't
> > * be exposed to the rest of the kernel. Include these directly here.
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> > b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c index 669babcaf245..fb1c44b11235
> > 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
>
> While you are at it, can you please split the EFI part out into a separate patch?
Sure! I will do it in V3.
Regards,
Sai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists