linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the nfsd tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181029122121.7758fed4@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 29 Oct 2018 12:21:21 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
        "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...il.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the nfsd tree

Hi Al,

Today's linux-next merge of the vfs tree got a conflict in:

  net/sunrpc/svcsock.c

between commit:

  64dbf4dc5496 ("SUNRPC: Simplify TCP receive code")

from the nfsd tree and commit:

  aa563d7bca6e ("iov_iter: Separate type from direction and use accessor functions")

from the vfs tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
index 3b525accaa68,0b46ec0bf74e..000000000000
--- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
@@@ -336,12 -338,8 +336,12 @@@ static ssize_t svc_recvfrom(struct svc_
  	rqstp->rq_xprt_hlen = 0;
  
  	clear_bit(XPT_DATA, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
- 	iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, READ | ITER_KVEC, iov, nr, buflen);
+ 	iov_iter_kvec(&msg.msg_iter, READ, iov, nr, buflen);
 -	len = sock_recvmsg(svsk->sk_sock, &msg, msg.msg_flags);
 +	if (base != 0) {
 +		iov_iter_advance(&msg.msg_iter, base);
 +		buflen -= base;
 +	}
 +	len = sock_recvmsg(svsk->sk_sock, &msg, MSG_DONTWAIT);
  	/* If we read a full record, then assume there may be more
  	 * data to read (stream based sockets only!)
  	 */

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped