[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181030083308.5znognajpwjvdxfv@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:03:08 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] base/drivers/arch_topology: Remove useless check
On 30-10-18, 08:55, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The workqueue is called from init_cpu_capacity_callback(). This one is
> called in the notifier callback. IOW the notification callback
> unregisters itself. But if it is not registered, it won't unregister,
> hence it won't call the workqueue and init_cpu_capacity_notifier() is
> not called.
Sorry, couldn't understand most of your reply :)
Though let me try to explain the problem I was trying to show you..
cpufreq-notifier-callback
-> init_cpu_capacity_callback()
-> free raw capacity
-> queue_work() to unregister the notifier
-> return
->init_cpu_capacity_callback() called again before work was processed.
-> If we don't check raw_capacity, we may end up using
NULL pointer, as the notifier isn't unregistered yet.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists