[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ea21329-48ec-c353-2cfc-659fbf85421b@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 21:54:44 -0400
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wangnan0@...wei.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org, kan.liang@...el.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, yao.jin@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES/RFC] Re: A concern about overflow ring buffer mode
On 10/29/2018 6:42 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:32:40 -0400
>
>> - struct annotation_options *annotation_options __maybe_unused)
>> + struct annotation_options *annotation_options __maybe_unused,
>> + atomic_t *nr_rb_read __maybe_unused)
>> {
>
> What is going on with the indentations of this patch?
>
Sorry, my editor auto wraps the line.
The patch has been sent in a separate email.
Thanks,
Kan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists