lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ea21329-48ec-c353-2cfc-659fbf85421b@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 29 Oct 2018 21:54:44 -0400
From:   "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wangnan0@...wei.com,
        jolsa@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org, kan.liang@...el.com,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, yao.jin@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES/RFC] Re: A concern about overflow ring buffer mode



On 10/29/2018 6:42 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:32:40 -0400
> 
>> -				  struct annotation_options *annotation_options __maybe_unused)
>> + struct annotation_options *annotation_options __maybe_unused,
>> +				  atomic_t *nr_rb_read __maybe_unused)
>>   {
> 
> What is going on with the indentations of this patch?
> 

Sorry, my editor auto wraps the line.
The patch has been sent in a separate email.

Thanks,
Kan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ