[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACvgo50MK1jU0jKMCfZJQSaSmpQ8mmYj1=4GP2NQvM_DHOaW-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 11:31:04 +0000
From: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
Cc: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ML dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>,
Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm/virtio: add uapi for in and out explicit fences
HI Gerd,
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 06:11, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > The execbuffer IOCTL is now read-write to allow the userspace to read the
> > out-fence.
>
> > #define DRM_IOCTL_VIRTGPU_EXECBUFFER \
> > - DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_VIRTGPU_EXECBUFFER,\
> > + DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_VIRTGPU_EXECBUFFER,\
> > struct drm_virtgpu_execbuffer)
>
> That changes the ioctl number and breaks the userspace api.
>
Have you looked at the drm_ioctl() implementation? AFAICT it
explicitly caters for this kind of changes.
-Emil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists