linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: pinctrl-npcm7xx: Set BGPIOF_VOLATILE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdbS_aOpFORVnK3QJUsF1p-mVxtMas-q6fOp7emTx281Lg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:08:14 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     kunyi@...gle.com
Cc:     "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        avifishman70@...il.com,
        OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: pinctrl-npcm7xx: Set BGPIOF_VOLATILE_REG

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 11:30 PM Kun Yi <kunyi@...gle.com> wrote:

> Indicate that the pins are both controlled by the pinctrl driver and the
> generic GPIO driver, thus GPIO driver should read the register value
> before updating, instead of using the stored shadow register values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kun Yi <kunyi@...gle.com>

This is quite a rough measure, if we instead use regmap-mmio
we can exercise fine control over what register are volatile and
not instead of saying that all of them or some of them are.

Yours,
Linus Walleij