linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] C-SKY(csky) Port for Linux 4.20

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2MGn6ugmex60Dj05aYHCjgbv9F38DRCLkGwZk2HfEFpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:32:25 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        c-sky_gcc_upstream@...ky.com, guoren1983@...il.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] C-SKY(csky) Port for Linux 4.20

On 10/30/18, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp> wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:44:59 +0900, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> just like ARM has mostly killed off the custom vendor-specific
>> instruction
>> sets already. If we add another architecture in the future, it may
>> instead
>> be something like the LLVM bitcode or WebAssembly, who knows?
>>
>
> I have one another port.
> Now we have a build environment so we can not merge right away,
> but I'd like to update it to the latest within a few months.

Ok, cool. Which one is that?

       Arnd