linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Improve virtio ID allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181030165222.GA10491@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 30 Oct 2018 09:52:22 -0700
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Improve virtio ID allocation

On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:53:39PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 09:00:27AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > I noticed you were using IDRs where you could be using the more efficient
> > IDAs, then while fixing that I noticed the lack of error handling,
> > and I decided to follow that up with an efficiency improvement.
> > 
> > There's probably a v2 of this to follow because I couldn't figure
> > out how to properly handle one of the error cases ... see the comment
> > embedded in one of the patches.
> 
> #1 + #2 pushed to drm-misc-next now.
> #3 should not be needed any more.
> waiting for v2 of #4 ...

Thanks!  I think we do still need a small part of #3.  Patches in
replies to this email.