[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cbeccaf1-33ec-0e54-0cfa-8cff81bbc1cd@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:40:27 -0400
From: William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: kprobes: Fix false positive with FORTIFY_SOURCE
On 10/22/18 5:30 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> The arm compiler internally interprets an inline assembly label
> as an unsigned long value, not a pointer. As a result, under
> CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE, the size of the array pointed to by an address
> of a label is 4 bytes, which was tripping the runtime checks. Instead,
> we can just cast the label (as done with the size calculations earlier)
> to avoid the problem.
>
> Reported-by: William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>
> Fixes: 6974f0c4555e ("include/linux/string.h: add the option of fortified string.h functions")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/probes/kprobes/opt-arm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/opt-arm.c b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/opt-arm.c
> index b2aa9b32bff2..2c118a6ab358 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/opt-arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/probes/kprobes/opt-arm.c
> @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ int arch_prepare_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op, struct kprobe *or
> }
>
> /* Copy arch-dep-instance from template. */
> - memcpy(code, &optprobe_template_entry,
> + memcpy(code, (unsigned char *)optprobe_template_entry,
> TMPL_END_IDX * sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t));
>
> /* Adjust buffer according to instruction. */
>
The patch fixes the issue for kretprobes. It looks good to me.
Thanks,
-Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists