[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOh2x==y+7jEdC-3xpvhr6j+RTtXRwTnBFC2uRVUmuktbCvsKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 11:20:19 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] base/drivers/arch_topology: Remove useless check
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 9:56 PM Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
Would have been better if I was cc'd on all the patches since I was
looking at this
stuff actively this week :)
> The function 'register_cpufreq_notifier' registers the
> init_cpu_capacity_notifier() only if raw_capacity is not NULL.
>
> Hence init_cpu_capacity_notifier() can not be called with raw_capacity
> set to NULL, it is pointless to check it.
It isn't entirely pointless though.
It is possible for init_cpu_capacity_notifier() to get called after
free_raw_capacity()
is called from it as the notifier unregistration happens from a workqueue.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists