lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181031232915.rvni33tf6m2orbbx@smtp.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Oct 2018 20:29:15 -0300
From:   Shayenne Moura <shayenneluzmoura@...il.com>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        outreachy-kernel@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] drm: Rename crtc_idr as object_idr to
 KMS cleanups

On 10/31, Julia Lawall wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2018, Shayenne Moura wrote:
> 
> > On 10/31, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 31 Oct 2018, Shayenne da Luz Moura wrote:
> > >
> > > > Rename 'drm_mode_config.crtc_idr' as 'drm_mode_config.object_idr',
> > > > as proposed in the task description in TODO list for KMS cleanups.
> > >
> > > Is object_idr a field that already exists?  If so, "Rename" is not the
> > > best choice of words.  It should be something like "use the object_idr
> > > field instead of the crtc_idr field" and then explain why.  "task
> > > description in TODO list for KMS cleanups" isn't very helpful to
> > > understand why the change should be made.
> > >
> > > julia
> >
> > Hi Julia,
> >
> > Thank you for your review!
> >
> > This patch is to solve this TODO task:
> >  drm_mode_config.crtc_idr is misnamed, since it contains all KMS object.
> >  Should be renamed to drm_mode_config.object_idr.
> >
> > Do you think I need to use this description in my commit message?
> 
> That seems more helpful.
> 
> But it seems that the name should actually be changed.  Which means that
> the structure definition should be changed too.  Was that done?
> 
> julia

Yes, you are right. I did not add the header file. 

Thanks again!

Shayenne

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ