[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACvgo51LU3dAfO-jNcV02ZyYBOv8fKLhG_2QyRrB9XYfGJrzHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 09:38:43 +0000
From: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
To: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
ML dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>,
Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm/virtio: add uapi for in and out explicit fences
Hi Rob,
On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 19:38, Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Add a new field called fence_fd that will be used by userspace to send
> in-fences to the kernel and receive out-fences created by the kernel.
>
> This uapi enables virtio to take advantage of explicit synchronization of
> dma-bufs.
>
> There are two new flags:
>
> * VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN to be used when passing an in-fence fd.
> * VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_OUT to be used when requesting an out-fence fd
>
> The execbuffer IOCTL is now read-write to allow the userspace to read the
> out-fence.
>
> On error -1 should be returned in the fence_fd field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...labora.com>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> - Since exbuf-flags is a new flag, check that unsupported
> flags aren't set.
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c | 5 +++++
> include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h | 13 ++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> index d01a9ed100d1..1af289b28fc4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
> @@ -116,9 +116,14 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> struct ww_acquire_ctx ticket;
> void *buf;
>
> + exbuf->fence_fd = -1;
> +
Move this after the sanity checking.
> if (vgdev->has_virgl_3d == false)
> return -ENOSYS;
>
> + if ((exbuf->flags & ~VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FLAGS))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
I assume this did this trigger when using old userspace?
With those the patch is
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@...labora.com>
Thanks
Emil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists