linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v13 08/12] KVM: x86: Add Intel PT context switch for each vcpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 31 Oct 2018 13:38:39 +0200
From:   Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@...el.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
        rkrcmar@...hat.com, joro@...tes.org, songliubraving@...com,
        peterz@...radead.org, kstewart@...uxfoundation.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, thomas.lendacky@....com,
        konrad.wilk@...cle.com, mattst88@...il.com,
        Janakarajan.Natarajan@....com, dwmw@...zon.co.uk,
        jpoimboe@...hat.com, marcorr@...gle.com, ubizjak@...il.com,
        sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 08/12] KVM: x86: Add Intel PT context switch for each vcpu

Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> writes:

> On 30/10/2018 12:26, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> There is a control in the perf event attribute that enables tracing the
>> guest. If this control is enabled, the kvm needs to stay away from any
>> PT related MSRs.
>
> This cannot happen once the guest has been told it can trace itself.

So, they need to be made mutually exclusive.

> There is no standard way to tell the guest that the host overrode its
> choice to use PT.  However, the host will get a PGD/PGE packet around
> vmentry and vmexit, so there _will_ be an indication that the guest
> owned the MSRs for that period of time.

Not if they are not tracing the kernel.

> If PT context switching is enabled with the module parameter, we could
> also reject creation of events with the attribute set.  However that
> won't help if the event is created before KVM is even loaded.

In that case, modprobe kvm should fail.

Regards,
--
Alex