[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <193a50fe-0c02-9f01-f110-5cfa1cec9283@grimberg.me>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:57:05 -0700
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/16] nvme: utilize two queue maps, one for reads and one
for writes
> +static int queue_irq_offset(struct nvme_dev *dev)
> +{
> + /* if we have more than 1 vec, admin queue offsets us 1 */
offsets us by 1?
> + if (dev->num_vecs > 1)
> + return 1;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
...
> @@ -1934,13 +2048,48 @@ static int nvme_setup_io_queues(struct nvme_dev *dev)
> * setting up the full range we need.
> */
> pci_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
> - result = pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity(pdev, 1, nr_io_queues + 1,
> - PCI_IRQ_ALL_TYPES | PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY, &affd);
> - if (result <= 0)
> - return -EIO;
> +
> + /*
> + * For irq sets, we have to ask for minvec == maxvec. This passes
> + * any reduction back to us, so we can adjust our queue counts and
> + * IRQ vector needs.
> + */
> + do {
> + nvme_calc_io_queues(dev, nr_io_queues);
> + irq_sets[0] = dev->io_queues[NVMEQ_TYPE_READ];
> + irq_sets[1] = dev->io_queues[NVMEQ_TYPE_WRITE];
> + if (!irq_sets[1])
> + affd.nr_sets = 1;
> +
> + /*
> + * Need IRQs for read+write queues, and one for the admin queue
> + */
> + nr_io_queues = irq_sets[0] + irq_sets[1] + 1;
> +
> + result = pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity(pdev, nr_io_queues,
> + nr_io_queues,
> + PCI_IRQ_ALL_TYPES | PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY, &affd);
> +
> + /*
> + * Need to reduce our vec counts
> + */
> + if (result == -ENOSPC) {
> + nr_io_queues--;
> + if (!nr_io_queues)
> + return result;
> + continue;
> + } else if (result <= 0)
> + return -EIO;
> + break;
> + } while (1);
> +
> dev->num_vecs = result;
> dev->max_qid = max(result - 1, 1);
>
> + dev_info(dev->ctrl.device, "%d/%d/%d read/write queues\n",
> + dev->io_queues[NVMEQ_TYPE_READ],
> + dev->io_queues[NVMEQ_TYPE_WRITE]);
> +
Perhaps it would be better if we move this code into a function.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists