linux-kernel - Re: gRe: [PATCH V5 1/5] KVM: X86: Memory ROE documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 31 Oct 2018 18:02:59 +0200
From:   Ahmed Soliman <ahmedsoliman0x666@...il.com>
To:     sean.j.christopherson@...el.com
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        nathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        김인겸 <ovich00@...il.com>,
        Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        nigel.edwards@....com, Boris Lukashev <blukashev@...pervictus.com>,
        Hossam Hassan <7ossam9063@...il.com>,
        Ahmed Lotfy <A7med.lotfey@...il.com>
Subject: Re: gRe: [PATCH V5 1/5] KVM: X86: Memory ROE documentation

On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 18:42, Sean Christopherson
<sean.j.christopherson@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 05:12:19PM +0200, Ahmed Abd El Mawgood wrote:
> > Following up with my previous threads on KVM assisted Anti rootkit
> > protections.
>
> All of the changelogs in this series need to be rewritten to adhere to
> Documentation/process[1].  In particular, use imperative mood and
> describe why/what is being done in a self-contained manner, e.g. the
> above line isn't very helpful without a lot of prior context.
>
> [1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#2-describe-your-changes
>
> > The current version doesn't address the attacks involving pages
> > remapping. It is still design in progress, nevertheless, it will be in
> > my later patch sets.
>
> This series should be tagged RFC if its design is a WIP.
Ops my bad, the current description is obsolete and I forgot to remove
it. I will have this fixed as well as your other comments in the next
patch series.