lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOesGMgWDM+Etng3bNU-Yem6+WRJEu+TfddzKoN-htno1Az3=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Oct 2018 10:52:51 -0700
From:   Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>
Cc:     Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Zong Li <zongbox@...il.com>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] RISC-V: A few build/warning fixes and cleanup

Hi,

On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:09 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 23:47:06 PDT (-0700), Olof Johansson wrote:
> > A couple of fixes for build breakage or warnings, and a small whitespace/asm
> > cleanup. The non-cleanups would be good to see in 4.20 to keep builds green.
>
> I'm happy to just keep them all together, since the cleanups are non-functional
> changes.  Patch 1/3 appears to have disappeared from my inbox and I can't get
> to the infradead archives, do you mind re-sending it?

Sure, check inbox in a few minutes.

> This also brings up a bigger issue: I need to stop breaking the build,
> particularly as we now support a bunch of configurations.  Is your CI stuff
> still running?  It'd be great to have it run against some of our integration
> branches so I can catch these before they make it upstream.  I haven't been
> getting any emails.

I've migrated machines to a new system and that CI is up and running.
Right now the emails don't go anywhere but me, but let me know where
you want them sent and I'll be happy to do so (probably not
linux-riscv due to volume/noise). They're also uploaded to
http://arm-soc.lixom.net/buildlogs/riscv/.

Since you keep single-patch branches in your tree, and I compile
everything for every branch, I've restricted what branches I poll and
build. Right now it's "for*" and "riscv*".


-Olof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ